September 2025 Family Law Update

General MCLE Credits: 0.25
15 minutes

Purchase CLE for $5

Noland v. Land of the Free, L.P. Court sanctioned an attorney for using AI hallucinations in briefs. “Simply stated, no brief, pleading, motion, or any other paper filed in any court should contain any citations—whether provided by generative AI or any other source—that the attorney responsible for submitting the pleading has not personally read and verified.” “To state the obvious, it is a fundamental duty of attorneys to read the legal authorities they cite in appellate briefs or any other court filings to determine that the authorities stand for the propositions for which they are cited.”

Adoption of X.D. Biological father who did not know mother carried child to term denied Kesley S. parentage when he immediately objected upon receipt of notice the child was born and an adoption was pending. Status denied because biological father knew mother was pregnant and did not become actively involved in the pregnancy.

In re X.D. WIC §300(g) applies when the child's parent has been incarcerated or institutionalized; and the child’s parent cannot arrange for the care of the child. The second element is met if, by the time of the hearing, the caregivers parent suggests are neither willing nor able to provide suitable care. Parent must designate someone who can provide suitable, reliable and appropriate care.

In re A.M. Father found to have designate someone who can provide suitable, reliable and appropriate care. Mother’s interference with Father’s designation does not make father incapable of arranging for the child’s care when father did not have the legal right to enforce his designation.

In re Miguel J. Jurisdiction proper under WIC 300(a) when child was accidentally struck during a physical altercation between parents.

Listen on Spotify for Free