Feehan v. Alameda / Seto. 3+ Parents / Visitation pending establishment of parent-child relationship.

CC v. DV. Stipulated DVRO gives rise to the presumption under 3044.

Cardona v. Soto. It is error to grant a Restraining Order after hearing based on evidence received in camera and not provided to the restrained party. An appeal of the issuance of a DVRO does not become moot after expiration if the finding will create a 3044 presumption

Marriage of Cady & Gamick. WIC 123.50 does not prevent parents from seeking child support under Family Code §3910.

Grossman v. Wakeman. Addressed to whom you owe a duty in the context of legal malpractice.

American Building v. Balfour. A party can recover fees as the prevailing party if it establishes that a contract is invalid or unenforceable for reasons other than illegality.

People v. Turntine. An otherwise admissible expert opinion is not inadmissible because it goes to the ultimate issue to be decided. MIL may not preserve appellate rights.

People v. Hall. With social media, the business records exception does not get statements in for the truth of the matter asserted, only shows the statements were made.

In Re. V.S. Sibling Bond Exception.

Dora V. v. Superior Court. Only legal guardians appointed under the Probate Code are entitled to a presumption of reunification in a dependency action.

In re Gilberto G. One bad day a dependency case does not make.

Arbitration. Rivera v. Ventura County, Maxwell v. Atria, Campbell v. Sunshine Behavioral